Differential Equations Classification
- Ordinary/Partial
- involving only ordinary derivatives with respect to a single independent variable is called an ordinary differential equation.
- involving partial derivatives with respect to more than one independent variable is a partial differential equation.
- Linear/Non-linear
- Linear: One in which the dependent variable $y$ and its derivatives appear in additive combinations of their first powers. May be written in the form
$$ a_{n}(x) \frac{d^{n} y}{d x^{n}}+a_{n-1}(x) \frac{d^{n-1} y}{d x^{n-1}}+\ldots+a_{1}(x) \frac{d y}{d x}+a_{0}(x) y=F(x) $$
- Order
- The order of the highest-order derivatives present in the equation.
- Homogeneous/Non-homogeneous
- Homogeneous: One that does not have terms involving only $x$ (and constants).
Explicit/Implicit Solutions
Explicit solution is a function which when substituted in the equation for the depended variable satisfies the equation for any value of the independent variable within a given interval.
Implicit solution is a relation that defines one or more explicit solutions.
Initial Value Problems
Definition
By an Initial Value Problem (IVP) we mean the set of a $n$th order differential equation
$$ F\left(x, y, \frac{d y}{d x}, \ldots, \frac{d^{n} y}{d x^{n}}\right)=0 $$
and the $n$ initial conditions
$$ y\left(x_{0}\right)=y_{0}, \frac{d y}{d x}\left(x_{0}\right)=y_{1}, \ldots, \frac{d^{n-1} y}{d x^{n-1}}\left(x_{0}\right)=y_{n-1} $$
where $y_{i}, i=0, \ldots, n-1$ are given numbers.
Solution of an Initial Value Problem
By an explicit solution of the above defined Initial Value Problem we mean a function $y=y(x)$ such that satisfies the above differential equation and all the above initial conditions.
Separable Equations
Determine a equation is separable
If the right-hand side of the equation $\frac{d y}{d x}=f(x, y)$ can be expressed as a function $g(x)$ that depends only on $x$ times a function $p(y)$ that depends only on $y$, then the differential equation is called separable.
In other words, a first-order equation is separable if it can be written in the following form.
$$ \frac{d y}{d x}=g(x) p(y) $$
Solving Separable Equations
$$ \frac{d y}{d x}=g(x) p(y) \Longleftrightarrow \int \frac{1}{p(y)} d y=\int g(x) d x $$
Solving Linear Equations with an Integrating Factor
We consider equations of the form
$$ \frac{d y}{d x}+P(x) y=Q(x) $$
The key idea: multiply both sides with a function $\mu(x)$ to get
$$ \mu(x) \frac{d y}{d x}+\mu(x) P(x) y=\mu(x) Q(x) $$
and hope that we can determine $\mu(x)$ such that we combine the terms $\mu(x) \frac{d y}{d x}$ and $r(x) P(x) y$ as
$$ \mu(x) \frac{d y}{d x}+\mu(x) P(x) y=\frac{d}{d x}(\mu(x) y) $$
Since the left hand side of the above equation is equal to the right hand side, the function $\mu(x)$ has to satisfy the equation
$$ \mu^{\prime}(x)=\mu(x) P(x) \rightarrow \mu(x)=e^{\int P(x) d x} $$
and thus we can write down the solution of the original equation (1) as
$$ y(x)=\frac{1}{\mu(x)} \int \mu(x) Q(x) d x $$
Check Exact Equation
$M(x, y) d x+N(x, y) d y=0$ is an exact equation iff
$$ \frac{\partial M}{\partial y}(x, y)=\frac{\partial N}{\partial x}(x, y) \quad \forall x, y \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} $$
Exact Differential Equations: The Algorithm
If $M(x, y) d x+N(x, y) d y=0$ is exact then check exact equation.
- $\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}=M \Longrightarrow F(x, y)=\int M(x, y) d x+g(y)$
- Take the partial derivative with respect to $y$ of the above, make it equal to $N$ and solve for $g \prime(y)$
- Integrate $g\prime (y)$ to get $g(y)$ and substitute back to the above equation to get the solution $F(x, y)$
Special Integrating Factors
$$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{\frac{\partial M}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial N}{\partial x}}{N}=T(x) \Longrightarrow \mu(x, y)=\mu(x)=\exp \left[\int T(x) d x\right] \ &\frac{\frac{\partial N}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial M}{\partial y}}{M}=S(y) \Longrightarrow \mu(x, y)=\mu(y)=\exp \left[\int S(y) d y\right] \end{aligned} $$
Solution lost or gained
- Lost: When multiplying $\frac {p(x, y)} {q(x, y)}$, check if $q(x, y)=0$ is a solution to the original equation
- Gained: When multiplying $\mu(x, y)$, identify those solutions to $\mu(x, y)=0$ that are not solutions to the original equation.
Solving Second Order Homogeneous Linear Equations
Solving
$$ ay{\prime \prime} + by{\prime} + cy = 0 $$
Solve auxiliary algebraic equation
$$ a r^{2}+r+c=0 $$
There are three cases
- $r_1 \neq r_2$ → $y(x) = C_1 e^{r_1 x} + C_2 e^{r_2 x}$
- $r_1 = r_2$ → $y(x)=C_{1} e^{\lambda x}+C_{2} x e^{\lambda x}$
- Complex roots
- If the auxiliary equation for the equation ay ${ }^{\prime \prime}+\mathrm{by}^{\prime}+\mathrm{cy}=0$ has complex conjugate roots $\alpha \pm \beta i$, then two linearly independent solutions to the equation are $e^{\alpha t} \cos \beta \mathrm{t}$ and $e^{\alpha t} \sin \beta \mathrm{t}$.
- A general solution can be expressed as a linear combination of these two solutions where $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ are arbitrary constants. $ y(t)=c_{1} e^{\alpha t} \cos \beta t+c_{2} e^{\alpha t} \sin \beta t $
- If the auxiliary equation for the equation ay ${ }^{\prime \prime}+\mathrm{by}^{\prime}+\mathrm{cy}=0$ has complex conjugate roots $\alpha \pm \beta i$, then two linearly independent solutions to the equation are $e^{\alpha t} \cos \beta \mathrm{t}$ and $e^{\alpha t} \sin \beta \mathrm{t}$.
Theorem (Wronskian & linear independence)
The Wronskian of $y_{1}(x), y_{2}(x)$ is defined to be
$$ W\left(y_{1}, y_{2}\right):=y_{1} y_{2}^{\prime}-y_{2} y_{1}^{\prime} $$
$$y_{1}, y_{2}$ are linearly dependent on an interval I iff $W\left(y_{1}, y_{2}\right)(x)=0, \forall x \in I$.
Undetermined coefficients
First, solve the homogeneous differential equation.
To find a particular solution to the differential equation for $a\prime\prime +b y \prime + cy = Ct^{m} e^{\alpha t} \cos \beta t$ or $a\prime\prime +b y \prime + cy = Ct^{m} e^{\alpha t} \sin \beta t$, use the trial solution$y_{p}(t)=t^{s}\left(A_{m} t^{m}+\cdots+A_{1} t+A_{0}\right) e^{\alpha t} \cos \beta t+t^{s}\left(B_{m} t^{m}+\cdots+B_{1} t+B_{0}\right) e^{\alpha t} \sin \beta t$, with
- $s=0$ if $\alpha+i \beta$ is not a root of the associated auxiliary equation and
- $s=1$ if $\alpha+i \beta$ is a root of the associated auxiliary equation.
- $s=2$ if $r$ is a double root of the associated auxiliary equation
Determine the values for $m, \alpha, \beta$, and $s$ to create the trial solution. Substitute the trial solution into the given differential equation and determine the unknown coefficients $A_{j}$ by equating the coefficients of like terms.
Variation of parameters
To determine a particular solution to the non-homogeneous differential equation $ay\prime\prime+b y{\prime}+c y=f$, take a particular solution of the non-homogeneous differential equation to be $y_{p}(t)=v_{1}(t) y_{1}(t)+v_{2}(t) y_{2}(t)$ for some functions $v_{1}(t)$ and $v_{2}(t)$.
Now determine $v_{1}(t)$ and $v_{2}(t)$ by solving the system below for $v_{1}{\prime}(t)$ and $v_{2}{\prime}(t)$ and integrating.
$$ \begin{aligned} y_{1} v_{1}^{\prime}+y_{2} v_{2}^{\prime} &=0 \ y_{1}^{\prime} v_{1}^{\prime}+y_{2}^{\prime} v_{2}^{\prime} &=\frac{f}{a} \end{aligned} $$
Integrate to find $v_1$ and $v_2$. Or, the general formula for $v_{1}, v_{2}$ is
$$ v_{1}=\int \frac{-f y_{2}}{a W\left(y_{1}, y_{2}\right)} d x, \quad v_{2}=\int \frac{f{y_{1}}}{a W\left(y_{1}, y_{2}\right)} d x $$
Method for solving Cauchy Euler Equations
A linear second order equation that can be expressed in the form
$$ a x^{2} y^{\prime \prime}(x)+b x y^{\prime}(x)+c y(x)=f(x) $$
where $a, b, c$ are constants, is called a Cauchy-Euler, or equidimensional equation.
Substitute $y=x^{r}$ to get the auxiliary equation
$$ a r^{2}+(b-a) r+c=0 $$
If this equation has
- two real roots $r_{1} \neq r_{2}$ then $x^{r_{1}}, x^{r_{2}}$ are two solutions.
- one repeated real root $r_{1}=r_{2}=r$ then $x^{r}, x^{r} \ln x$ are two solutions.
- two complex roots $\alpha+\beta i$ then $x^{\alpha} \cos (\beta \ln x), x^{\alpha} \sin (\beta \ln x)$ are two solutions.
Linear Algebra
Singular Matrix → $\det=0$, no inverse
- Compute $\lambda$ and $v$ such that $A v=\lambda v \Rightarrow(A-\lambda I) v=0$.
- For nontrivial solutions we need to have $|A-\lambda I|=0$. Solve for $\lambda$.
- Plug-in the computed value of the eigenvalue $\lambda$ in $(A-\lambda I) \mathrm{v}=0$ to compute, associated to $\lambda$, eigenvector $v$.
Wronskian
The Wronskian of two differentiable functions $f$ and $g$ is $W(f, g)=f g^{\prime}-g f^{\prime}$.
More generally, for $n$ real- or complex-valued functions $f_{1}, \ldots, f_{n}$, which are $n-1$ times differentiable on an interval $I$, the Wronskian $W\left(f_{1}, \ldots, f_{n}\right)$ as a function on $I$ is defined by
For vector valued functions, the Wronskian is just the determinant of the matrix where each column is a function.
On an interval $I$ where the entries of $A(t)$ are continuous, let $x_1$ and $x_{2}$ be two solutions and $W(t)$ their Wronskian. Then either
- $W(t) \equiv 0$ on $I$, and $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$ are linearly dependent on $I$, or
- $W(t)$ is never 0 on $I$, and $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$ are linearly independent on $I$.
Solving $x^\prime(t)=\mathbf Ax(t)$
Suppose the $n \times n$ matrix $\mathbf A$ has $n$ linearly independent eigenvectors $\mathbf{u_1, u_2, \ldots u_n}$. Let $r_i$ be the eigenvalue corresponding to $\mathbf u_i$. Then ${\mathbf{e^{r_1t} u_1, e^{r_2t} u_2, \ldots e^{r_nt} u_n}}$is a fundamental solution set. Consequently, a general solution is $\mathbf x(t) = \mathbf{e^{r_1t} u_1 + e^{r_2t} u_2 + \ldots + e^{r_nt}u_n}$ where $c_1, c_2, \ldots, c_n$ are arbitrary constants.
Same eigenvalues $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = \ldots = \lambda_n$
- Try finding two linearly independent eigenvectors $\vec v_1, \vec v_2, \ldots \vec v_n$
- If found, do the same as above
- If not, do this
- Start with eigenvalue $\vec v_1$ (solution to $(\mathbf A - \lambda \mathbf I)\vec v=0$)
- Find $\vec v_2$ from $(\mathbf A - \lambda \mathbf I)\vec v=\vec v_1$
- Repeat to find Find $\vec v_n$ from $(\mathbf A - \lambda \mathbf I)\vec v=\vec v_{n-1}$
- Solution will be:
- general solution to the homo.
- $\vec x_1 = \vec v_1 e^{\lambda t}$
- $\vec x_2= t \vec x_1\ + \vec v_2 e^{\lambda t}$ (note that $\vec x_1$ is from the previous line)
- …
- $\vec{x_{n}}=e^{\lambda t}\left(\vec{v_{n}}+t v_{n-1}+\cdots+\frac{t^{n-1}}{(n-1) !} \vec{v_{1}}\right)$
- Superposition of the above
Complex Eigenvalues
If the real matrix $A$ has complex conjugate eigenvalues $\alpha \pm i \beta$ with corresponding eigenvectors $\mathrm{a} \pm i \mathrm{~b}$, then two linearly independent. To find the complex eigenvectors, use complex conjugate in ref. Complex vector solutions to $x^{\prime}(t)=Ax(t)$ are
$$ \mathrm{x}{1}=(\mathrm{a}+i \mathrm{~b}) e^{(\alpha+i \beta) t}, \quad \mathrm{x}{2}=(\mathrm{a}-i \mathrm{~b}) e^{(\alpha-i \beta) t} $$
Wr equivalently to the following two real vector solutions
$$ \mathrm{x}{1}=e^{\alpha t} \cos \beta t \mathrm{a}-e^{\alpha t} \sin \beta t \mathrm{~b}, \quad \mathrm{x}{2}=e^{\alpha t} \sin \beta t \mathrm{a}+e^{\alpha t} \cos \beta t \mathrm{~b} $$
Solving $x^\prime(t)=\mathbf Ax(t) + \vec f(t)$
- Let $\vec x_g = c_1 \vec x_1 + c_2 \vec x_2 + \ldots + c_n \vec x_n$ be solution to the homogeneous system of equations; let $\vec x_p$ be a particular solution to the non homogeneous system of equations.
| If $\vec f$ contains | Guess |
|---|---|
| $t^k (k \in \mathbb Z^+)$ | $\vec a_{k} t^{k} + \vec a_{k-1} t^{k-1} + \ldots + \vec a_1 + \vec a_0$ |
| $\sin t$ | $\vec a_1 \sin t+\vec a_2 \cos t$ |
| $e^{\lambda t}$ (not solution to homo.) | $\vec a_1 e^{\lambda t}$ |
| $e^{\lambda t}$ (solution to homo.) | $(\vec a_{n} t^{n} + \vec a_{n-1} t^{n-1} + \ldots + \vec a_1 + \vec a_0) e^{\lambda t}$ |
The Matrix Exponential Function
$\vec x \prime = \mathbf P \vec x$ has solution $\vec x = e^{t\mathbf P} \vec c$.
To calculate $e^{t \mathbf P}$:
- If $\mathbf P$ is diagonal, $\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & \cdots & 0 \ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \ 0 & \cdots & \lambda_n \end{pmatrix}$. $e^{t \mathbf P}=\begin{pmatrix} e^{t \lambda_1} & \cdots & 0 \ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \ 0 & \cdots & e^{t \lambda_n} \end{pmatrix}$
- Otherwise, let $(\lambda_1, \vec v_1), \cdots, (\lambda_n, \vec v_n)$ be Eigenpairs of $\mathbf P$
- $e^{t\mathbf P}=\mathbf E e^{t \mathbf D} \mathbf E^{-1}$
- $\mathbf E = \begin{pmatrix} | & & | \ \vec v_1 & \cdots & \vec v_n \ | & & | \end {pmatrix}$, $\mathbf D = \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & \cdots & 0 \ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \ 0 & \cdots & \lambda_n \end{pmatrix}$
- Non-diagonalizable
- Not enough linearly independent eigenvectors
- Cannot be written as $\mathbf E \mathbf D \mathbf E^{-1}$ for some diagonal matrix $\mathbf D$
- Use “Same eigenvalues”
Laplace Transform
Properties of Laplace Transforms Table of Laplace TransformsDefinition: $\mathcal{L}{f(t)}=F(s)=\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-s t} f(t) d t$
| $f(t)$ | $F(t)$ |
|---|---|
| $C$ | $\frac C s$ |
| $t$ | $\frac 1 {s^2}$ |
| $t^2$ | $\frac 2 {s^3}$ |
| $t^n$ | $\frac {n!} {s^{n+1}}$ |
| $e^{-at}$ | $\frac 1 {s+a}$ |
| $\sin \omega t$ | $\frac{\omega}{s^{2}+\omega^{2}}$ |
| $\cos \omega t$ | $\frac{s}{s^{2}+\omega^{2}}$ |
| $\sinh \omega t$ | $\frac{\omega}{s^{2}-\omega^{2}}$ |
| $\cosh \omega t$ | $\frac{s}{s^{2}-\omega^{2}}$ |
| $u(t-a)$ | $\frac{e^{-a s}}{s}$ |
| $g^{\prime}(t)$ | $s G(s)-g(0)$ |
|---|---|
| $g^{\prime \prime}(t)$ | $s^{2} G(s)-s g(0)-g^{\prime}(0)$ |
| $g^{\prime \prime \prime}(t)$ | $s^{3} G(s)-s^{2} g(0)-s g^{\prime}(0)-g^{\prime \prime}(0)$ |
Solving DE with Laplace Transforms
- Take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation.
- Use the properties of the Laplace transform and the initial conditions to obtain an equation for the Laplace transform of the solution and then solve this equation for the transform.
- Determine the inverse Laplace transform of the solution by looking it up in a table or by using a suitable method (such as partial fractions) in combination with the table.